Sunday, February 9, 2014

Journal entry #1

Design class so far has always been held in a very abstract learning process. First we start out with a few guid lines. Then we draw a few lines. Then some more. And more after that. Eventually we create some rules, fix up the lines we drew, change them up a bit to add some flavor, add more lines to create density. The end product, a pattern that can be reproduced over and over with just some rules. This time around, I decided to ditch the traditional orthogonal lines. This time around, I picked up the french curve. And it all started out fine using an orthogonal grid to create consistent curves of different proportions, until I put everything on its edge. I changed it up turned the grid diagonal, which created still four sided shapes as a reference for creating later curves. BUT they were all the same lengths and angles anymore. This is were i got stuck and how i ended up with this:
a blank diagonal grid for the pin up. This is when my professor Robert Bracket pushed me over that damn annoying architect's block. Who cares if each shape wasn't the same. Just count them and start from there. Instead of measuring, just count those shapes.

Spatial Readings and Tintern Abby

It’s surprising how much space you need. It would surprise you how even the most absurd things would need some space. The easiest example of this is in your own head. Everyone thinks, no matter how unintelligent or how intelligent even, you think. These thoughts need space to occur. Incomprehensible right? No matter who you are, you need room for your thoughts, your ideas and your opinions. All this takes place in your brain; your brain is the place. However, you can only find all this in your mind.  Your mind is different form your brain just like how space and place are not the same, but still relate and sometimes are even within each other. As Michel de Certeau says in his writing, “Spatial Stories”, “Space is a practice of place.” But is it really?
            “To go to work or come home, one takes a “metaphor”- a bus or train. Stories could also take this noble name: every day, they traverse and organize places; they select and link them together; they make sentences and itineraries out of them. They are spatial trajectories.” As Michel de Certeau described in the text, transportation was the way of linking one place to another like work or home. Your everyday life turned into a story, and “every story is a travel story- a spatial practice. Such metaphor gave daily events structure, a step by step or 1-2-3 of your events because you took into consideration of space.
            Now this all makes sense, but is space really a practice of place? A place could be within a space, or rather it is. I believe in a different definition of these terms, space and place. Space is more of a general term for every volume out there. On the other hand, place is more unique more special. Place is a space given an identity, given form. Places are special.
            Places are more, well thought out and given the privilege of occupying a certain space. In the long title of “Tintern Abbey”, the Hermit sits alone. The poem opens up with the lines “FIVE years have past; five summers, with the length of five long winters!” A time frame was given from just the words five years. Time is intangible and can only be seen through its power on its surroundings, exactly like space. As we progress further down the stanza, we find out how much the hermit loves this place he has not been to in FIVE long years. This place, the bank of the Wye is of the physical world. He finds love and comfort in this place. But these feelings take place in the space of these banks.  The feelings and love for this place are the intangible sensations created by his mind. The mind is the space that translates all these “things” into place. From this, how can space be a practice of place when place is transformed space? In conclusion, place is the physical the limited; it’s space being forced into reality.  And space, it’s the intangible and unrestricted.
            The author of “Spatial Stories”, believes space only exists when one takes into consideration vectors of direction, velocities, and time variables. But is this not a better definition of place; something that has been grounded by these guidelines.  that’s not what space is. Space is indefinite. But even so, does anything really exist? Or does it all just take space in your mind?

Monday, February 3, 2014


Key Words for Fred Sandback Installation
-controlling
-limits
-biased
-divided
-rules
-cut
- wastage


Key Words for Playing with Strings
        Experience
-controlled
-detached
-centered
-curved
-boomerang
-limited working space
-conservative
-tension
-low to high
-point
      Occupying
-bridge
-middle
-ceiling
-thin
-invisible
-vine
-transparent
-cave
-entrance
-sky

The world
Two Fingers
Processed                                      Established
Connection

    Fred Sandback showed how easily space can be altered. Even with the slightest addition of an acrylic string the space can have a different feel. Such subtleties demonstrate the fragility of space. Through the process of creating space, designing space, everything changes the outcome. Just like Fred Sanback showed even strings can create a wall. 

Wednesday, January 29, 2014

The Practice of Everyday Life Questions

Tours and maps

Questions
1. Space is a practiced place, but is a place not a more specific space?
2.  Does a "map" also depict motion like a "tour"?
3. If earlier maps were based off of ones own "measurements", this would mean the map would vary from person to person. How is this not different from a tour which is more of a personal description one gives to others to create a visualization?